For a flexible language like Scala, it's useful to think of subset of the programming language, like your own personal Good Parts, and opinionated style guides.
To try -Yno-lub, you can drop in the following sbt plugin to project/ynolub.sbt:
When Scala's type inferencer finds type A and type B to unify, it tries to calculate the lub (least upper bounds) of two types with regards to <:<. This process is sometimes called lubbing. Here are some of the examples:
Two days of #ScalaMatsuri ended as a huge success. But for the next year, I'm leaving ourselves a few homeworks to work on. As the title suggests, the next goal that we should aim for is universal access. In Scala language, universal access principle indicates the fact that both methods and fields can be accessed interchangeably from outside.
For a conference, I mean universal access to mean being more inclusive to various groups of people:
This year was the second Scala conference in Japan. We've changed the name to ScalaMatsuri, which means Scala festival in Japanese. 300 tickets sold out. With invited guests and free tickets for sponsors, there may have been even more people. The venue was at CyberAgent, which runs blog service and online ad services.
The need for regular expressions is real. Whenver I need to transform a set of text files it usually ends up with fumbling through the documentation of find command, zsh, and StackOverflow Perl questions. I would rather use Scala instead of muddling through Perl. It's really the matter of my familiarity than anything else.
For example, I now have over a hundred reStructuredText files that I want to convert into markdown. I first tried pandoc, and it looked mostly ok. As I was going through the details, however, I noticed that many of the code literals were not converting over as formatted. This is because they were formatted using either single ticks or using Interpreted Text. Preprocessing the text with a series of regex replacements should work.
First, a quote from Programming in Scala, 2nd ed. p. 192:
Scala requires [override] modifier for all members that override a concrete member in a parent class. The modifier is optional if a member implements an abstract member with the same name.
In this post, we'll discuss this "The modififier is optional." Since overriding an existing method with implementation requires override modifier, and failure to do so would result to a compiler error, there's not much to talk about for that case. We'll focus on whether one should put override modifier or not in the case of overring an abtract method. I don't think there's going to be any difference in Scala version, but let's assume the latest stable 2.10.3.
I've been thinking about exploring a subset of Scala in a wonderland setting without the "real world" constraints such as Java familiarity and interoperability. If using Scala as an alternative Java is acceptable, why not try using it as an alternative functional programming language? Another point of this thought experiment is to see some of the duplicate constructs can be reduced. In this article, I'm not interested in finding out the idiomatic way, or calling something good or bad. I'm calling this The Flying Sandwich Parts (TFSP).
scopt is a little command line options parsing library.
Today, I'm releasing scopt 3.0. If you're not interested in the implementation details, skip to the readme.
Around March 4th, 2010, I became a committer to scopt, a fork of Aaron Harnly's scala-options that was written in 2008. I think I wanted to make a few changes around the usage text, key=value options, and argument list. Since then I've been fielding all the bug reports, including the request to publish the jar on scala-tools.org. On March 18, 2012, I forked the project again to scopt/scopt and released scopt 2.0.0 that added immutable parser.